I dig your new chocolate turnover. I mean, I really, really dig it. It’s delicious. I want you to know that. I do. But we have a problem.
You know how your restaurant features its “5 for $5.95” menu deal? Personally, I preferred the original “5 for $5.00” promotion, but I understand that not even Arby’s truck drivers and transport systems are insulated from rising fuel prices, and I also know you have to make ends meet. Get it? You folks serve meat. Hee hee hee. I never fail to amuse myself!
Ok. I’ve digressed. Let me explain.
At lunch today, I had an incredible hankering for a couple of your chocolate turnovers. So I ordered my Arby’s roast beef sandwich, my Arby’s onion petals, my orange drink--it wasn’t a Crush, which, truthfully, is the best mass-produced orange drink available, and notice that I said “mass-produced” because the best orange drinks I’ve ever had were personally prepared by someone special in my life--and, of course, I selected the two chocolate turnovers, which really were what I wanted to eat most of all, but, hey, I was trying to go for the whole “balanced diet” bit especially since my potassium level is low and I need more fiber in my diet.
Still, as much as I dig your chocolate turnovers, let me share a secret with you: I’m not going to overpay for them. And if your “5 for $5.95” promotion menu displays a “turnover,” well, I think it’s only fair and reasonable for anyone to assume that includes your “chocolate turnover” in the deal. And, again, that’s why I ordered my two chocolate turnovers for my dessert today.
Now imagine my surprise when the cashier with the glasses and mustache tells me that I’ll “have to pay extra for the chocolate turnover.”
WHAT?
I’ll repeat: WHAT?!??!
Now, Arby’s, your promotional “5 for $5.95” menu clearly displays a photo of a “turnover.” Or at least it does at the one on Fifth Avenue in downtown Huntington, West Virginia. I’m not sure about the one on Hal Greer near the I-64 exit. I stopped going there for a reason. It’s a reason that I really don’t want to detail in this letter. Trust me, though, I swear it has absolutely nothing at all to do with Arby’s or its affiliates and/or subsidiaries (and, hey, I hear “Wendy” is gonna be your new sister! Congrats!) or its wonderful food (and, seriously, your chocolate turnover rocks!). Well, anyway, your promotional menu--you know, the one you keep on the counter that resembles a really huge placemat? It clearly shows a picture of a turnover. And it doesn’t preface the “turnover” with any description, either. It doesn’t say “apple” before “turnover” or “cherry” before “turnover” or even “chocolate” before the “turnover.” To reiterate (I like saying “reiterate” better than “repeat” even though I always feel slightly pretentious when I use it): It just shows a picture of a “turnover” with no other description. And the “turnover” on that big placemat sure looks an awful lot like the chocolate turnover I had a hankering hunger for today. Do you see where I’m going with this? Of course, you do.
Well, Arby’s, when I see a ginormous promotional placemat featuring your “5 for $5.95” menu with a picture of a “turnover” and no description, I think it’s safe to assume that the “turnover” you’re including in your “5 for $5.95” menu includes the very chocolate turnover that I’ve had an incredible hankering hunger for. I mean, I suppose I could have looked at the picture carefully and tried to determine if the actual filling depicted in the photo of the turnover on your giant placemat were, in fact, really chocolate and not apple or cherry or some other substance before I ordered it. That’s what I did only after the man wearing glasses with the mustache making minimum wage told me that I would have to pay extra for my two chocolate turnovers. You remember, those chocolate turnovers, right, Arby’s? And do you know what else, Arby’s? Do you know what else?!?
WHEN I LOOKED AT YOUR GINORMOUS PLACEMAT FEATURING YOUR FANTABULOUS “5 for $5.95” MENU I STILL COULD NOT TELL BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT WHAT KIND OF FILLING WAS REALLY IN THE TURNOVER AS PHOTOGRAPHED!!!
But, again, you didn’t have any clarifying language on your ginormous promotional placemat. Not even a frickin’ asterisk that reads something like this:
*5 for $5.95 menu does not include chocolate turnover.
OR THIS:
*Apple turnover pictured.
OR EVEN THIS:
*Add 10 cents for chocolate turnover.
I mean, seriously: Do you think that your customers aren’t going to care about paying ten (10) cents more for your chocolate turnovers? Well, I do care, Mr. and Mrs. Arby and little Wendy and I’m mad as you know what and I’m not going to take this anymore.
I’m hoping you remedy this matter soon, Arby’s. Because it’s not about the money, it’s the principle of the thing.
Ok. Maybe it’s about the money just a tiny bit.
Yeah. It’s about the money.
And don’t even get me started about not calling your potato cakes “latkes.”
April 27, 2008: Rescue Turtle 911
Since we moved to Huntington, we know Spring has arrived when we discover a turtle in our yard.
I dig turtles. I can’t think of any pet I’d rather take a photograph of than a turtle. Wait. That’s not the complete truth. I know I would rather take a picture of a chinchilla. I have no idea why that is--well, actually, I do have a pretty good idea of the “why,” but that would require a rather lengthy explanation using a set of chinchilla pictures, and I don’t have any of those--or at least any that I could use here.
My family found this dude in our back yard yesterday afternoon. Notice he’s stuck in between the wires of our back yard fence. When I saw this picture, I could not believe how rusty our fence is! It’s so rusty that Baby Sooby--as my son dubbed him--was able to bend it in his escape attempt. I guess Baby Sooby didn’t see that the gate of our back yard’s fence was open. (It doesn’t latch.)
Baby Sooby is the spitting image of the turtle we found last year. Jackie asked me if “I took him as a hostage,” and I told him in the comments-- and this is my direct quote-- “He’s probably somewhere in our backyard. He’ll be back!” And he did come back! But when we set Baby Sooby free, we did not expect him to get trapped in our back yard fence. (Its gate still latched last year).
If Baby Soob y does not appe ar very happ y in this photo , it’s only becau se he’s want s to know why I’m busy taking pictures of him stuck in the rusty fence. It’s almost as if I can hear him say in his best Sam Kinison impression:
“OH, HEAVENS NO, PLEASE DON’T RESCUE POOR, PITIFUL BABY SOOBY JUST YET! BACK AWAY FROM THE FENCE! YOU CAN’T POST TO YOUR PRECIOUS LITTLE BLOG UNLESS YOU SPEND SEVERAL MINUTES TAKING PICTURES OF STUCK BABY SOOBY. WELL, HEY, HERE’S A SUGGESTION, ASSHOLE:PUT DOWN YOUR FUCKING DIGITAL CAMERA AND GET ME OUT OF HERE!!!!!!!!!
I’d never make it as a nature photographer. The guilt would kill me.
April 26, 2008: Things That Don’t Rock
1. Getting a splinter embedded in between your fingers doesn’t rock.
2. Flat soda doesn’t rock.
3. A working garage door rocks--but leaving it open all night by accident definitely doesn’t.
4. Negative thoughts don’t rock.
5. Neither does hypocrisy.
6. Governor Manchin does not rock, but it’s moot because the majority of the voters in West Virginia still believe he rocks, and everybody knows he’s going to cruise to another term in the governor’s mansion.
7. Rum raisin ice cream does not rock. Obviously.
8. Drawing three “q’s” in Yahoo!’s literati does not rock.
9. Having someone tell you that “You look like a balding 25-year old” rocks when you are really a “balding soon-to-be-41-year-old” guy. It doesn’t rock when you are Sinead O’Connor or Britney Spears.
10. January, February and September do not rock.
11. Profanity rocks, but not having the guts to use it on your own blog doesn’t.
12. Dusty Baker as the Reds’ manager does not rock.
13. Monday mornings do not rock. And neither does Garfield.
14. Being on the outside looking in does not rock.
April 25, 2008: Wikipedia Challenge II
It’s time to play everyone’s favorite newly-invented internet game of wits and wackiness. . . . welcome to WIKIPEDIA CHALLENGE!
The object of Wikipedia Challenge! is simple: Review a list of subjects and guess the one that doesn’t currently rate a Wikipedia entry.
It’s fun. It’s simple. It’s an excuse to post a blog entry!
Today’s second Wikipedia Challenge! is a really easy one and features two notable names from West Virginia current events. As of 7:30 a.m. this morning, only one has a Wikipedia entry. To play, click the person’s name whom you think has the coveted Wikipedia entry:
UPDATE 4/28/08: For those of you who took the Wikipedia Challenge! last week, the correct answer was “Mike Garrison.” He now has his own coveted Wikipedia entry.
Heather Bresch, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Mylan, Inc.
How did you do? Great!
And remember: Everyone who plays Wikipedia Challenge! wins. The only way to lose is not to play.
Disclaimer: Wikipedia Challenge! is NOT affiliated, connected, endorsed, or recognized by Wikipedia, which has its own extensive Wikipedia entry. Wikipedia Challenge! has no Wikipedia entry and may not even exist.
April 13, 2008: Any Resemblance To Real Persons Is Purely Coincidental
In 21, which I really enjoyed at the movies the other day, one of the film’s characters Cole Williams, played by Laurence Fishburne, argues about the drawbacks of “facial recognition” software as it involves catching card counters in Las Vegas. No computer, explains Cole, can detect signals and movements used by professional teams of card counters that are used to obtain an advantage against the casino.
I love playing blackjack, but someone like Cole Williams wouldn’t have to worry about me at the tables in Vegas. That’s because:
1) I don’t count cards;
2) I don’t play high stakes; and
3) If you ask most people whom I resemble, a definite pattern emerges.
In high school, I remember a classmate telling me I looked like that kid Horowitz from Bad Boys. Had we both been cineastes, he would have probably told me that I resembled Eric Gurry. He played Barry Horowitz, whom Wikipedia describes as:
. . . . a small, wiry Jewish kid named Barry Horowitz, (Eric Gurry), who gives the character both a much-needed sense of humor (thus inducing a few laughs into the otherwise grim material) and an element of danger (he is at the reform school because he firebombed a bowling alley in an attempt to kill some kids who beat him up).
Oh yeah, if you omit the part about firebombing the bowling alley, that definitely captures me as a teenager.
I scoured the internet for pictures of Eric Gurry to post, but the best I could do was this snapshot of the dvd cover for a film he did with Al “Hoo Hah!” Pacino:
Hmm. I don’t recall ever watching Author, Author, but the IMDb lists Hoo-Hah!’s height at 5’7,” and he’s towering over Gurry in the shot, so I suppose the “small” description fits. I can’t really tell if Gurry’s as wiry as Wikipedia describes, but I have to admit that not only was I pretty wiry back in ‘83, but I was also pretty Jewish then, too, even if I didn’t wear a yarmulke.
When Murphy Brown cracked jokes about Dan Quayle, a girlfriend of mine told me I looked like Grant Shaud, who played Miles on Murphy Brown. That’s “Miles” as in “Miles Silverberg.”
I’ve drawn an arrow pointing toward’s Miles face. And I swear, if you remove his glasses, it’s like Eric Gurry’s older self is looking at himself in the mirror! Of course, my girlfriend often told me how “cute” she thought Grant Shaud was.
Wikipedia attributes the following quote from Miles to Murphy Brown at the end of the “Political Correctness” episode:
"Yeah, like I'm gonna take comedy tips from a shiksa".
I guess I should mention my girlfriend at the time was a shiksa.
By the late 1990s, I commuted to Huntington. During lunch one afternoon, as I was enjoying a plate of spaghetti at Jim’s, the man himself, Jim Tweel, approached my table and told me that I looked just like this fella:
Apparently, life is beautiful, but I’m not.
I suppose I should mention that I was single at the time and sitting at a table with four women, a couple of whom were also single.
I apparently bear an uncanny resemblance to fictional Italian-Jewish characters. My four-year old son repeatedly tells me how much I look like “George from the television show”:
I’m not complaining. He’s a definite improvement over Roberto Benigni, whom my wife tells me I “definitely resemble.” (This is one of the many reasons I love my wife because she’s honest with me.)
And when I showed him Roberto’s above picture, my son told me “That’s Daddy.” And this is one of the many reasons I love my son.
But I’m still thankful that I’ll never have to worry about anyone mistaking me for this guy:
Of course, with the facial recognition software now available, who knows?
It’s been real.
April 12, 2008: Things That Make Me Feel A Certain Shame, Nos. 4 and 5
I shop at Wal*Mart. And when I use its automated self-service checkout, I think the animated lady on the display looks kinda hot.
April 10, 2008: It’s OVER.
Four days.
Four campaign videos.
Endorsements from superheroes, professional wrestlers, a reverend and a terrorist.
248 votes.
The final tally: Peanut Butter Chocolate Ice Cream: 56.5%, “Thrilla” Vanilla Ice Cream: 43.5%.
Thanks to everyone who participated. This has been the most enjoyment I’ve ever had with politics. 8)
April 6, 2008: Choose Wisely
Voting ends on Thursday, April 10, 2008 at 5:00 PM EDT.
UPDATE: As of 10:00 PM on 4/7/08, voting remains incredibly close with “Thrilla” Vanilla maintaining a slim lead over Peanut Butter Chocolate by 51.9% to 48.1%.
BREAKING: As of April 8, 2008 at 6:00 PM EDT, Peanut Butter Chocolate adds momentum following endorsements from Moneytastesbad and Bill from Don’t Print This and takes a 53.5% to 46.5% lead over “Thrilla” Vanilla.
BREAKING: With less than 24 hours of voting to go, Peanut Butter Chocolate expands its lead to double digits over the “Thrilla” Vanilla by 56.6% to 43.4% with a hearty endorsement from Allclick and strong voter support from California, Texas, Wisconsin, North Carolina, Connecticut and the Keystone State.
Rumor has it that the “Street Team” is busy preparing a response as I type at 6:42 P.M. Details to follow. . . .
As of 9:54 P.M. on 4/9/08: INCREDIBLE SURGE BY “THRILLA” VANILLA. . . . VANILLA TAKES SLIGHT LEAD OVER PEANUT BUTTER CHOCOLATE. . . DETAILS TO FOLLOW. . . . .
BREAKING: With 140 votes reported, Peanut Butter Chocolate reclaims lead over “Thrilla” Vanilla with 52.1% of vote as of 11:58 P.M. on 4/9/08.
From the DBET flava wire: Earlier tonight, Peanut Butter Chocolate had enjoyed an enormous double-digit lead over Vanilla until the “Street Team” and its minions implemented “Operation: Quick and Fast” and reclaimed a slight lead over the PBC.
Minutes ago, the DBET received reports from The Thirty-Year Old Freshman alleging that the Dynamic Duo have been observed enjoying PBC cones and circulating a photograph of Osama bin Laden endorsing “Thrilla” Vanilla. The “Street Team” could not be immediately reached for comment, but a source that asked to remain anonymous has revealed that the “Street Team” would offer another swift response. According to the anonymous source, “The ‘Street Team’ isn’t going to put up with any more of this %$*#, and I can assure you that when all is said and done that there will not be any doubt left that Vanilla--the Thrilla--is the one, the only and the greatest ice cream flavor eva.”
April 3, 2008: Peanut Butter Chocolate vs. Vanilla: Parallel Universe Edition
As I type this, there’s an hour and a half left to vote. But we all know it’s inevitable. It’s gonna be:
PEANUT BUTTER CHOCOLATE vs. “THRILLA” VANILLA
And before anyone questions this flava matchup, I strongly encourage you to follow this link courtesy of Scarlet and hum The Twilight Zone theme to yourself as you read it. Coincidence? I think not.
The best creams rise to the top.
Voting in the final match begins soon.
And remember: Tell yo momma to vote!
April 2, 2008: Peanut Butter Chocolate Defeats Chocolate!
It’s official: Out of a total of 62 votes counted, Peanut Butter Chocolate Ice Cream soundly defeated Chocolate Ice Cream by a 61.3% to 38.7% margin. Chocolate had held an early lead throughout most of the day, but just couldn’t “finish it” against the underdog Peanut Butter Chocolate.
By the way, there were no votes received by e-mail or from outside the United States. I would post an image of the Google map that shows the votes, but Google’s terms of use prevent my doing that. In short, it looks like someone spilled a drop of green paint on California and an entire can of red paint over the entire region of Appalachia.
PBC will now face the winner of “Thrilla” Vanilla Ice Cream and Cookies ‘N Ice Cream to determine the best ice cream evah.
Voting closes at midnight tomorrow.
Update at 6:30 PM on April 2, 2008: Thirteen votes in and Cookies ‘N Cream has the lead.
“Cookies ‘N Cream Capitulation Update” at 8:00 AM on April 3, 2008: 25 votes in and “Thrilla” Vanilla is trouncing Cookies ‘N Cream by a 68% to 32% margin.