Please tell us about your dining experience:

expressivecynic [at]yahoo.com

September 2004

September 29, 2004: Growing Pains

Seth has a low grade fever, and his sickness resulted in unusual cranky behavior from him. The slightest inconvenience--such as Mommy leaving the room for a moment--provoked loud bursts of cries and tears from him. He looked pitiful until he tired and fell asleep in my lap.

For his first six months, I often held Seth in my lap. He couldn’t crawl or walk, nor did he squirm or resist my cradling him in my arms. Since he turned one year old, however, Seth has resisted my efforts to cuddle him, and today his fever allowed me the rare opportunity to rock him to sleep.

When I held him on the day of his birth, Seth stretched across the length of my waist. Then, a few months later, I could lie on my back, and, with my arms, prop him into a standing position. If I place Seth in my lap now, his appendages spill over my legs. It’s impossible for me to stand him on my tummy if I’m on my back. And when I tell him it’s time to change his diaper (where he’s informed us he’s just made his “doo doo”), he dashes across the dining room.

I’m savoring these moments because I know that the days speed into the weeks, the months, and then pass into the years.

 

 

 

September 27, 2004: Yes, We Have No Bananas

Seth loves bananas. He calls them “na-nas,” and lately he requests them at least once a day. I think he eats more bananas per day than Barry Bonds walks per game. Last week, we bought five or six bananas for our household, and they didn’t last longer than a couple days. On my way home from work, I purchased five more bananas for Seth. Thirty hours and five banana peels later, I needed to make another trip to the grocery store. At his current pace, Seth should eat over six hundred bananas in the next year.

 

 

 

September 22, 2004: Talkin’ Baseball (Yom Kippur Edition)

Shawn Green has not yet announced if he’ll play in the weekend series between the Dodgers and the Giants. The Dodgers lead Barry Bonds’ Giants by one and a half games with eleven games left to play. Shawn Green is Jewish, and in the past, when a scheduled game fell on Yom Kippur, the day of atonement for followers of Judaism, Green elected not to play.

Between 1998 and 2002, Green averaged over 30 home runs, 100 runs batted in, and 20 stolen bases per season. In 1998, he joined the select ranks of the 30/30 club, which means that he stole at least 30 bases and hit over 30 home runs in one season. (Other noteworthy players who are members of the 30/30 club include Willie Mays, Barry Bonds and Alex Rodriguez.)

Over the past two seasons, Green has suffered the effects of a shoulder injury, which hampered his offensive production. Last year, he hit “only” 19 homers and drove in 85 runs while stealing only six bases. This year, after undergoing surgery to repair his damaged labrum, Green’s offense improved, and after an auspicious start, he is now on pace to hit nearly thirty home runs.

Green’s decision to play or not to play wouldn’t make the news if he were a marginal, or even journeyman player. But Shawn Green is not an ordinary player, and when healthy, he ranks as one of the best in baseball. Based on his current statistics, and the effects of his repaired shoulder, Shawn Green will most likely not qualify for the Hall of Fame after his career ends. (Click on the link about his labrum surgery for a well-reasoned opinion on how the torn labrum may affect Green’s future as a hitter). But as a Jewish baseball player--a rare combination--he still ranks as the third best--behind Sandy Koufax (arguably one of the best pitchers ever in baseball) and Hank Greenberg.

On the Dodger’s team this year, Adrian Beltre has had his career year and led the team (and often the national league) in home runs and rbi’s. But Green is still the team’s leader and offers the second best bat in the lineup. And the Dodgers need his bat.

I will disclose that I am neither a fan or a foe of the Dodgers, but I would like to see Barry Bonds have another chance to win a World Series. That said, if Green chooses not to play in the two games that fall on Yom Kippur, and the Dodgers lose, some people will blame him if the Dodgers fail to make the playoffs. I think that’s improper because over the last six seasons Green has rarely missed a game. Last year, he elected to play through his shoulder injury and missed only two games. And in 2001, the only game he missed was the game that took place on Yom Kippur.

Baseball is, of course, a team sport. This year, someone could make a compelling case that Barry Bonds is the Giants team. Still, Shawn Green is not the only player on the Dodgers, and at least this year, he’s not its best player, either. The Dodgers will have 160 chances to win ballgames with Green, and to pin the blame on him for missing a couple games to honor his religious beliefs is to disrespect his honor for his beliefs. Would anyone’s reaction be as strong, as Tony Kornheiser noted on tonight’s “Pardon the Interruption,” if Green or any other player missed a couple games to attend to the birth of his child or an ill loved one? I think not. And it makes no difference if Green misses one or two games for the holiest day of the Jewish year.

By the way, Shawn Green is on my winning fantasy baseball team, which since my previous Talkin’ Baseball post is now playing for the championship in one of Yahoo!’s public fantasy leagues. Win or lose I applaud Green’s decision if he decides not to play this weekend.

September 21, 2004: Taken For Granted

The movie “Shattered Glass” tells the story of Stephen Glass, a former reporter for The New Republic, whose phenomenal stories were too good to be true. That’s because they weren’t, and Stephen Glass lied. Over the years, his magazine, and others, printed his lies. How did it happen? Simple: Nobody questioned Stephen Glass’ word, his investigation, or sources.

This week, Dan Rather screwed the pooch and admitted he made a mistake when he and CBS accepted the truth of false documents involving President Bush’s military service. The obvious question is how did this mistake happen? Simple: Nobody questioned Dan Rather’s word, his investigation, or sources. And why should they? Dan Rather is a veteran reporter, with hundreds of credentials, who has anchored thousands of newscasts while working for a large, respected, national network. It’s not like Dan Rather is a Stephen Glass or Jayson Blair or Jack Kelley-type reporter. Oh, wait, I forgot. Jayson Blair wrote for The New York Times and Jack Kelley was the acclaimed veteran who wrote for USA Today.

You see where I’m headed here. When most of us read a story or hear the news from an established reporter working for a major media organization, we accept the truth of his or her story. Before Dan Rather, I remember watching Walter Cronkite delivering his broadcasts on CBS and watching older tapes of his reports on the Kennedy assassination and Viet Nam. My parents recalled hearing Cronkite’s voice on the radio and reeling when they heard his tearful report of Kennedy’s death. When Walter Cronkite delivered the news, he told the truth. The polls reflected his status as “the most trusted man in America.” And nobody had any reason to doubt Walter Cronkite’s word.

This isn’t Camelot anymore. We’re a long, long way from Kansas, too, and find ourselves mired in a prolonged, indefinite military action in Iraq. Like in Viet Nam, we’re losing solidiers every day. The numbers of the casualties may be different now, but that doesn’t change the grief of the mothers, fathers, sisters, brothers, sons and daughters who have all lost members of their families. And for what reason did their loved ones die? President Bush tells us we’re waging a war against terrorism. He tells us we’re waging a war for democracy. He tells us we’re waging a war to secure freedom for the people of Iraq. He tells us all these things and, based on the current polls, most of the voters believe him.

After all, a sitting President of the United States of America, the most powerful democracy on the planet, wouldn’t lie, now would he?

September 19, 2004: Sabbatical

We here at Donutbuzz appreciate those readers who frequent this site. Recent personal events, however, force us to limit the usual frequency of our postings over the next several months days. Please accept our apologies.

September 17, 2004: Don’t Disturb This Groove

The Wife: “Honey, what song is now playing on the random mix?”

Me: “I don’t know. . . . but I’m afraid that may be a song from one of my albums.”

The Wife: “I can’t believe we have that.”

Me: (Checks our rack of compact discs and finds the eighties compilation “Only Dance” with track “Don’t Disturb This Groove” by The System). “Neither Can I.”

 

 

 

September 15, 2004: The Good Neighbor

When I wrote about our neighbor next door with the amazing horticulture skills, I should have also mentioned our other neighbor who lives a couple houses up the street. This neighbor, our resident gardening expert, maintains the best manicured lawn on our steet. Every weekend, when it’s not raining, we’ll see him pushing his wheelbarrow, or clipping his hedges, and--of course--mowing his lawn. Sometimes he mows the lawns of the other neighbors, one of whom, my wife and I have confirmed, is now his girlfriend. Several weeks before we learned this news, he washed the siding of this woman’s house, which, of course, raised our suspicions because why would anyone want to wash the siding of anyone’s house, much less his own? But I digress.

I like this neighbor, and so do my wife and son. When sees us, he’ll greet us with a sincere hello and smile. Then we’ll usually have a little conversation. Last week, he trimmed some of the empty lot next door without our asking. When I told him how much I appreciated his efforts, he shrugged off my compliment. He loves working outdoors, and the neighbors appreciate having him in the community.

This past Sunday, when our family returned from visiting Melanie’s parents, my wife noticed someone lying in a ditch next to a lawnmower perched on the street. It was our gardening expert. My wife called to him, and he replied that he was fine. But when I found him, he had cuts on his head and nose, and could not speak clearly. He was disoriented, and couldn’t tell how long he had been in the ditch. He couldn’t even offer any account of how his accident happened. My wife called the paramedics. When they arrived, our neighbor was able to provide his name, the name of the President of the United States, and his date of birth. Then the paramedics helped him to his feet, and he walked toward the doorway of another neighbor’s house. He was still dazed.

I spoke with several of our other neighbors, who had now arrived to provide help, which included towels and water for him. One of the other neighbors is a nurse, and she took off his shoes, and fanned him with a newsletter I had retrieved from our mailbox a few minutes earlier. None of us could determine how this man--who is an active and seemingly healthy person--could have injured himself.

After the ambulance arrived, I returned home. Twenty minutes or so later, one of the neighbors rang our doorbell. She told us he had refused medical treatment at the hospital. None of us could understand that decision. So I went back to our neighbor’s house to check on him.

I rang his doorbell. He invited me inside the house. It was immaculate. “Just like his yard,” I thought. When I asked him what was going on, he responded, “You tell me.” I then asked him who was winning the baseball game on television. The Braves were pounding the Expos by seven runs. “You tell me,” he responded again. And he still couldn’t tell me how the accident happened. Now I was really worried. We both stared at each other, and after a few minutes of awkward pleas from me to seek help, I left.

Melanie and I decided that we should impress upon our neighbor that he really needed to seek medical treatment. He didn’t listen to me, I told my wife. We decided that my wife would make a Jello cheesecake for him, which we would deliver after dinner. We would also take Seth with us.

Six p.m. arrived, and Melanie, Seth and I coursed up the hill to his house. When Seth walks with us, he often pauses to inspect the various twigs and other debris on our path. This time, however, Seth did not inspect the road, and we reached the house quickly. I was more apprehensive about my second visit because I knew that our appeal to our neighbor to seek treatment would not persuade him.

My prediction, unfortunately, proved correct. Seth pitched a mini-fit, and our resident gardening expert still did not offer his usual ebullient remarks. The visit left Melanie and me more worried about his condition, so we decided to visit another neighbor--one who we believed could successfully urge him to get medical help.

The other neighbor had also tried--and failed--to convince him to go to the emergency room. And the man’s girlfriend couldn’t get him to go either.

The next day, I called our injured neighbor at lunch time to check on him. He still didn’t sound well, and did not report for work. Somebody had visited him, however. Our neighbor thanked me again for helping him, and I hung up the phone. I was disappointed.

Later that evening, when I took the trash out, I saw several of the neighbors who had assisted with the rescue. They told me that our favorite gardening expert had, in fact, reported to the hospital for various tests.

Hopefully, all is well with our neighbor. It will be awhile, however, before either one of us wants to mow the grass.

September 9, 2004: The Sword Is Mightier Than The Pen

I’m a lawyer. Lawyers solve problems. If someone has a problem, a lawyer researches the law, reviews the facts, and devises a plan to solve the legal dilemma. Sometimes this means the lawyer files a legal action for a client, which if successful, will result in a remedy for the client. Or--as we lawyers are wont to say--at least in theory the client should receive a remedy when the parties resolve their dispute.

But what happens when a party refuses to honor a jury verdict or a negotiated settlement? “Ah,” as the Bard would say, “Now there’s the rub.”

Imagine an outcome where the successful litigant, an injured worker, for example, will receive a sum of money payable by a certain date. The date for payment of the proceeds is due, but, alas, no check arrives at your office. A day passes, but there is still no check. And then it’s a week, and your client, who relied on the prompt payment of the proceeds, still doesn’t have the funds. So you, the lawyer, call the other lawyer, and gently remind him that, although you understand these delays occur, that doesn’t absolve his client of the obligation to honor the settlement. The other lawyer politely responds that he understands your client’s situation, and, yes, he’ll do everything he can to deliver the check to your office. When will that be, you ask him. I don’t know, he replies, and yes, he’s really sorry, I mean really he is, but he can’t give you the exact date. Wednesday, you suggest, is it possible to have the proceeds by Wednesday, because on Friday it will be three weeks since payment was due, and you’re willing to forgive a couple days’ delay, but it’s really, really hard for you to understand how it can possibly take this long for his client to deliver the check, especially when you told him to have the check available when the parties resolved the case last month, and don’t forget that your client keeps calling you and asking about the settlement check, and what are you supposed to tell him when he calls. Yes, yes, he knows, he understands, he sees, he’ll do everything he can, but he cannot possibly, under any circumstances, provide an definite date, or an iron clad date, or any date certain for when you’ll receive the check because if he did, he’d suffer further embarrassment, and he has sufficient egg on his face now, please, please understand, please, and maybe he’ll have the check this Friday. Ok. Fine. Then the check will arrive on Friday, you say, and he says Friday, and you say talk to you later, and as he says bye you hear him hang up his phone.

Friday arrives, and you watch the clock. At noon, you ask the receptionist if any check has arrived for you. No, it hasn’t she tells you, you’ve asked me this three times this morning, and why do you keep asking me this? I told you, you tell her, and please let me know when it does arrive. I will, she tells you, and you understand from her response that you will never ask her about the check any more that day. Then, at ten minutes before 5 p.m., you realize there is no check in your office, and your client’s very angry, yes, very angry indeed, because he doesn’t know why the defendant couldn’t cut the check, and he’s told you this several times that day, perhaps a dozen that week, and you’ve told him that you don’t understand it either, and that you’re pursuing it, yes, I really am, and I called the other attorney two days ago, and believe me, we’ll have the proceeds soon. How soon? I don’t know. I’m sorry. But I promise, we’ll have them soon, and if we don’t get them by Monday morning, we’ll file a motion to compel settlement, and that will spur them to pay the settlement. I guarantee it. Then you hang up the phone because you have to use the bathroom.

And then Monday arrives, and so does the check, which was due twenty-four days earlier. And your client, who incurred a giant bill at Wal*Mart can now pay the bill, and you can rest easy until you resolve your next case.

 

 

 

September 7, 2004: If Dorothy Kunhardt Were Writing This Entry

Here is Seth. He can do lots of things. You can do lots of things, too.

Seth can climb onto the green couch, then run across all its cushions without falling. Now you climb onto the green couch, then run across all its cushions without falling.

Seth can ask for vegetable crackers in sign language, and stuff five whole crackers into his mouth. Now you ask for vegetable crackers in sign language, and stuff five whole crackers into your mouth.

Seth can scream at the top of his lungs at the library, and elicit smiles from almost everyone. Now you scream at the top of your lungs at the library, and elicit smiles from almost everyone.

Seth can draw compliments from complete strangers wherever he goes. Now you draw compliments from complete strangers wherever you go.

Seth can tell us when he’s pooping by rapidly waving his right hand in front of his nose. Now you tell us when you’re pooping by rapidly waving your right hand in front of your nose.

Um...ok...that’s all for now. Wave “Buh-bye.”

 

 

 

September 6, 2004: The Greatest Toys Ever

Lego: My dad purchased my first set in the early 1970s. I remember the box had compartments for the different pieces--the four-by-two blocks, the wheels with metal spokes, the windows, and tiny pieces that gouged your feet when you tripped over them en route to the bathroom at night. The Lego I played with as a child didn’t include any instructions on building anything, as the current sets do. I know this because I still play with Lego today and, truth told, Lego is really a toy that adults buy for themselves under the guise of buying it for their children. That’s what I look for in a toy when I decide whether Seth will enjoy it: Can Mommy and/or Daddy play with it after the child’s asleep? I call this the “Lego Test.”

Lincoln Logs:They satisfy the Lego test, and Lincoln Logs are the wooden version of Lego. Because wood products cost more to manufacture, however, our house does not contain any sets of Lincoln Logs. If you think it’s tough to justify a dvd purchase of the three seasons of Seinfeld set, then try to imagine convincing your spouse or significant other that you want to play with a “classic” Lincoln Log set that costs over a hundred dollars. Yeah, I know. I can’t justify it, either. But I’m hopeful that by the time he reaches three or four that Seth will appreciate the craftsmanship of Lincoln Logs and demand that we purchase a set for him.

The Fisher-Price juggernauts: The parking garage. The farmhouse with silo. The airport. The houseboat. The mainstreet. And the original Little People. I always loved the Little People, and several years ago, this guy named Quinn started a site that featured several “Little People” sets he had crafted. He made an “X-Files” set, a Simpons set, and even a nativity scene. Pure genius.

Mr. Potato Head. I’ve covered this here. Someday, I hope to have the original set. Again, I can’t justify this purchase--yet.

Building Set With Plastic Girders and Attachable Windows and Doors Pieces. This was a fantastic building set. I don’t remember it’s name, and I have searched in vain for it on Ebay. You could make skyscrapers or any building you wanted, however, and it really resembled something. The windows and doors were composed from individual plastic sheets, and measured no thicker than a piece of notebook paper. You attached them to the plastic girders, which had small protuding knobs for the sheets’ placements. Does anyone else recall this toy?

 

 

 

September 4, 2004: Now With Comments

While Seth slept on Grandma, my wife rested on the sofa and I finally installed some comments on this site. My e-mail remains the same, but why not share your opinions on this site or anything else here?

Ok. . . play nice, and remember to leave the last donut in the box for someone else!

 

 

September 2, 2004: The Dream Of The Purple Turtles

I had one of my most vivid, weird dreams this morning. Directly in front of me were three humongous statues of purple turtles with a yellow stripe bisecting them. Each sculpture measured at least thirty feet long, and perhaps ten feet deep; I’m not certain of the turtles’ exact proportions. Quite frankly, I was too freaked out to determine the size of these purple and yellow-striped turtles to remember the description of the other person in my dream to whom I clearly recall remarking:

Dude, those are some f*cking huge turtles!

For those who find my description of the turtles vague or general, I have with the aid of Jasc’s Paintshop Pro program attempted to recreate the picture of one of those humongous, f*cking turtles:

Seth’s favorite tub toy has caused this parent enough anxiety.

September 1, 2004: Ten Animal* Noises Seth Makes That Qualify As Legitimate Words In National Scrabble® Association Play

    1. ar

    2. ba

    3. baa

    4. ha

    5. hah

    6. haha

    7. mm

    8. moo

    9. ow

    10. woof

    *Includes human noises

All written material ©2004-2007 by HEG.