Please tell us about your dining experience:

expressivecynic [at]yahoo.com

September 2007

September 29, 2007: Banned Books Week

Today marks the start of “Banned Books Week.” In celebrating our freedom to read and think, I thought I’d offer a few stories about my favorite books that others have challenged. I’ll try and do this over the next week. (We’ll see how that works. Heh heh.)

The first book on my list--and coming in at #25 on the American Library Association’s  “100 Most Frequently Challenged Books”--is Maurice Sendak’s “In the Night Kitchen.” Wikipedia explains the controversy behind “In the Night Kitchen”:

Critics of the book object to Mickey's nudity, with some librarians drawing little pants on Mickey with a marker, or diapers with correction fluid. Some also take a Freudian interpretation of events, with the nudity, free-flowing milky fluids, and giant (allegedly phallic) milk bottle.

I had never heard about the allegations of Mickey’s “pen and ink” underwear until earlier this year. That’s when I discovered that a copy of “In the Night Kitchen” that my wife and I had checked out of our local library included the altered version of Mickey. In fairness to our local library, it’s possible that a patron defaced the book. I should also add that I have since found another copy of the same book at this library that nobody has altered.

I’ve always enjoyed “In the Night Kitchen,” and would rank it as my second favorite Sendak book (with “Where the Wild Things Are” ranking first, of course). As a child, I had a copy of “In the Night Kitchen” that my parents read to me, and it did not include the “pen and ink” underpants. My mom and dad read this book to me many, many times. And I can assure you that as a result of having been read this book--and reading it on my own--that I have never made a naked high dive into a ginormous container of milk at any time in my life. Nor have I had any urge to do so.

I must say, however, that I do get very, very thirsty for milk every time I read “In the Night Kitchen” to our children. Maybe someone should let the dairy farmers know, huh?

 

 

 

September 23, 2007: Sunday Thoughts On Free Speech

Columbia University plans to allow Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Iran’s president, to speak despite protests. Although this is not new or local news, I still wanted to offer my thoughts on this because--like jedi--I am interested in free speech. I also graduated from Columbia College and the university still sees fit to keep me on its mailing list.

Although I obviously disagree with Ahmadinejad’s views about Israel and the Holocaust, he still has the opportunity to air his ludicrous and unfounded opinions at the university. In fact, as an educational institution, Columbia should support the exchange of ideas. That should include even those ideas like Ahmadinejad’s that folks consider repugnant or even dangerous.

I’m sure that those who seek to prevent Ahmadinejad’s speech have good intentions, and I’m also sure that they don’t want to encourage the adoption of his views. But what these folks forget is that free speech doesn’t mean allowing only speech with which we agree. Or as Columbia University President Lee Bollinger notes, inviting Ahmadinejad to speak is part of “Columbia's long-standing tradition of serving as a major forum for robust debate.”

I would also note that one of my literary heroes, Kurt Vonnegut, once noted that the First Amendment is the most tragic amendment. I saw him in person at Barnard when I was a student at Columbia. And I’m glad that nobody prevented him from speaking.

 

 

 

September 21, 2007: Griffey

He's out for the season.

By the way, I have no idea why this site had nearly 400 RSS visits yesterday, but I hope everyone enjoyed the site.

 

 

 

September 19, 2007: Have You Had Yours?

Interview with the chinchilla.

 

 

 

September 16, 2007: A Quick Open Letter To The Huntington Herald-Dispatch

Dear Huntington Herald-Dispatch:

Did all Sunday editions of your newspaper today omit the complete standings and Saturday box scores for Major League Baseball? Or was it only my copy?

Cordially,

Donutbuzz

 

 

 

September 10, 2007: An Aphorism A Day Keeps The Lawyers Away. . . .

An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. . . . unless, of course, the pound of cure causes serious illness--in which case it’s worth filing a civil complaint.

Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery until your imitation infringes on someone’s original copyrighted content, registered trademark and/or patent.

A watched pot never boils, especially when the pot is defective or the result of a defective design.

That which does not destroy us makes us stronger to request punitive damages in our class action lawsuit for what attempted to destroy us.

Truth fears no questions. . . but the damned lies drive it crazy!

 

 

 

September 8, 2007: Heroes

I bought the first season of Heroes on dvd. Now I’m totally hooked on this show.

Someday, I’ll have to watch The Sopranos, Deadwood, Battlestar Galactica and The Family Guy.

So many television shows, so little time.

(Note: Yes, my posting here has been kinda sparse lately. If you have to ask. . . .)

 

 

 

September 6, 2007: Jacknuts

Courtesy of the Film Geek, we can all enjoy another destination on our daily blog travels: The Jacknut Chronicles.

Go make your nomination now!

 

 

 

September 3, 2007: Did Anyone Really Need To Film A Sequel To Charlotte’s Web?

That’s what I keep asking myself after spending the past couple days watching Charlotte’s Web 2: Wilbur’s Great Adventure. It’s like a case of the good news/bad news around here:

Hey, I get to spend some quality time with my kids! That’s good.

But they want to watch television. That’s bad.

Hey, they want to watch Charlotte’s Web! That’s good.

But, Dad, we want to watch the one with Nellie and Joy. That’s bad.

Ok. So at least I get to watch another film I haven’t seen. That’s good.

Oh, wow. Is this sequel awful! Nobody from the first film supplies any of the voices. Oh. That’s really bad.

Wait. The animation’s not that bad. Really. It’s kinda colorful. That’s good. Yeah, yeah. That’s really good!

Hold on. Where’s the adventure, Wilbur? And what the heck does Fern growing a prize tomato have to do with the rescue of Cardigan, the lamb? Oh, no, this is bad. Very, very bad, indeed.

I can convince my kids to watch the first film. That’s really good. I mean, Templeton rocks.

No, Daddy! We don’t want to watch that film. Wonderful. I mean, not good.

And I really miss Paul Lynde. That’s sad.

Wait. Hey, kids, I think the dvd player’s broken. Oh, yes. That’s really good, indeed.

I never thought I’d see the day when I’d say this, but right now I’m starting to appreciate our Dora, The Explorer dvd more than ever.

 

 

 

September 1, 2007

I’ve lost track of my number of posts. It’s probably close to 700. It’s also interesting because the more I blog, the more I discover about myself. I believe that if you do this long enough that your blogging reflects who you are. Of course, I suppose that may not apply as strongly if you limit your writing to, say, imagining how a gazelle might view modern American society.

Hmm. . . . I think I have another idea for a blog I’d much rather write than this one.

 

 

 

All content ©2004-2007 by HEG